Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!

These words, often attributed to others, were penned by Sir Walter Scott. They can be found in the 17th stanza of the poem, Marmion, Canto VI. There will be many webs to untangle through these posts. I will try to be as fair as I can in my presentation. However, I will have an opinion. I will happily change it with new evidence or a convincing counter-argument. I will also seek to be respectful of those whose lives I will be giving some account of. However, we are neither angels nor devils, so there will be some shades of grey emergining over the next several posts.

I am hoping that those who are looking for information about various people might pick up clues at this site that will shorten their search. I also hope that those who have further information will be willing to share it to create a fuller picture of the family and the times in which the various members lived.

This post continues a story taken up for the first time in the previous post. It seeks to ask and answer, to one degree or another, the question: Who was Jeremiah Ingalls? I am not talking about the composer. Well, I will have something to say about him. However, my focus will be on Jeremiah Boss, the son of Stephen and Lucina (nee Bulman) Boss. Jeremiah Boss can be found with his family in the 1850 and 1860 Federal Census data for Kirkland, New York. There is evidence that he enlisted in Company I of the 2nd Oneida Regiment, the 26th New York Volunteers. Company I was, in fact, recruited from Oriskany in Oneida County. He is reported to have been wounded in the thigh by a ball at the Battle of Fredericksburg.

Yet, he is not to be found again in the Census data. Did he die of his wounds? I do not think so. In the previous post, I mentioned the Act that increased the invalid pension of Jeremiah Ingalls (alias Jeremiah Boss). This is the first of many clues to be followed. It leads directly to the pension claim that he applied for on 24 December 1864. Later, a Margaret Ingalls would make a widow's claim in Minnesota in 1916. It is to Minnesota that we must go.

In the 1870 Federal Census data, a Jerry Ingalls can be found in Shell Rock, Freeborn, Minnesota. He is 27 and was born in New York. His occupation is listed as a carpenter and joiner and he has $700 worth of real estate and $300 of personal funds. In 1880, a Jeremiah Ingals (37) can be found in the Federal Census data in Austin, Mower, Minnesota. He is with his wife, Margarett (29) and children: William (8), Ada (6), Alice (4) and Arthur (2). He is listed as a house carpenter whose parents, like himself, were both born in New York. His wife was born in Canada. Her father was born in Scotland and her mother in Canada. That her maiden name was Gemmel is asserted here and here. The family base will not move from Austin in Jeremiah's lifetime.

Many of the family are buried in the Oakwood Cemetery in Austin, Minnesota. Jeremiah's headstone can be viewed here. Margaret's is here. At this site, you can find the following information:

Ingalls, Jeremiah E. 04-10-1843 06-23-1916
Ingalls, Margaret P. 02-19-1851 07-05-1934

The "E" may be for Eugene. They had a son whose middle name was Eugene.

Something interesting happens in the 1885 Minnesota Census (1 May 1885). His year of birth is still listed as 1843. However, while he nominates himself as having been born in New York, he lists both his parents as having been foreign born. Additionally, although there is a column specifically for this question, he makes no mention that he was a soldier in the Civil War. It gets stranger still in the 1890 Veteran's Schedule. Here his is listed as Jeremiah Ingalls, alias Jeremiah Boss, who served as a private in I Company of 26 NY Infantry from 26 April 1861 until 28 May 1863. In the notes it states that he had a gun shot wound to the right testicle and hip, a bayonet wound to the right leg and a sabre wound to the left wrist. He is also listed as having chronic diarrhea and piles. There is a further note that is quite strange. It states that he took his step-father's name when he enlisted, as he was under age at the time.

If this is Jeremiah Boss of Kirkland, New York, there are some interesting implications. But, I will wait to speak to them as the plot actually thickens somewhat. In the 1900 Federal Census, he is 55 years old, works as a carpenter (althought he was not employed for 5 months in the previous year), owns a mortgaged house, was married in 1871 and lists both his parents as having been born in France. His wife has seven of nine children living and is 49. In fact, the census has Jeremiah as being born in April 1845 and Margaret in February 1851. They have a number of children still living at home: Victoria (August 1800), Jerry A. (November 1883), and Lucy A. (June 1887--yet she is listed as 2 years old...so, should this be 1897?). They have two roomers living with them; one is a printer and the other a day labourer.

In 1910, their daughter Lucy (12) still lives with Jerry (68) and Margaret (64). Jerry is wagon-maker who has worked each week during the past year, owns his own home free and clear, was in the Union Army and has two parents who were French. In 1920, a Margaret Ingalls (68 and born in Canada of a father from Scotland and a mother from Canada) lives in Lyon, Minnesota with her son-in-law, Arthur W. Calkins (24), and his wife, Lucy (22). They have a son named Arthur E. Calkins (2). In 1930, a Margaret Ingalls (80) lives in Mobridge, Walworth, South Dakota with her son-in-law, William James (60) and his wife, Victoria (49). Margaret had emigrated to America from Canada in 1858 and her father was born in Scotland and her mother in Canada.

According to this obituary, Jerry and Margaret lost their third child, Alice Zoe, in 1905. She died in her parents' home on West Maple Street after suffering for some time from a stomach abscess. She left a husband and child. She also left three brothers and three sisters: Will Ingalls, Mrs. Ada Hart, Arthur Ingalls, Victoria O'Dell, Burt (perhaps from Jeremiah Albert) and Lucy who was still living with her parents. The 1905 Minnesota Census indicates that the address was 510 West Maple Street. Jeremiah is listed as being 66 years old and Margaret as 54. Jeremiah's parents are still listed as having both been born in France. Jeremiah was a wagon-maker and had been a soldier in the Civil War. Both Lucy and William were living with Jerry and Margaret on 3 June 1905. Oddly, Margaret's mother is listed as having been born in Michigan.

Why the alias? And, which name is the alias? I believe that Ingalls is the alias. It makes no sense to use your "step-father's" last name to hide being underage at your enlistment. Additionally, the family actually lists his birth as 10 April 1843. He would have been 18 at his enlistment. In fact, the data states just this fact when he enlisted in May 1861. Also, he enlisted in a company comprised of men from Oriskany in Oneida. If Stephen Boss was his "step-father", then everyone would know him and the alias is hardly an alias. Besides, in 1860, there are only two adult Ingalls in Utica and surrounds. They are both in their earlier thirties and from Scotland. One is in the mental asylum.

Ingalls is a Scottish and English name with Viking associations. It is hard to believe, but not impossible that both parents would be born in France and the father's name of Anglo heritage. But, this does not fit the facts. Lucina was not listed as having been born in France. So, unless this Jeremiah Boss/Ingalls was not even from Oneida, the alias should be Ingalls and not Boss. The story about being underage and taking your step-father's name would be a convenient way to explain the fact that your current documentation and your discharge papers with their notes were in different names. However, it would really only work with someone who might not otherwise care. While my mind can be changed by other evidence, I find it an unconvincing story in itself.

But, why the alias and why French parents? Let's start with the second question first. If Lucina Bulman was Jeremiah's mother, then she would have had Native American heritage as did her brother Henry Bulman according to his son, Grisel Bulman. The Indian wars may have made admitting to a Native American heritage undesirable in the West. If Jeremiah was dark complected and had higher cheekbones, it might have been more convenient to claim French ancestry than Native American. It happens all the time. It is clear that before 1885, Jeremiah indicates that both parents had been born in New York.

Why the alias? By the time that the 2nd Oneida Regiment fought in the battles associated with Fredericksburg, they had already lost a large number of their original 1200-odd men. In those fateful days of December 1862, the 26th New York Volunteers could only put 280 men into the field. After the fighting, 170 men were found to be killed, wounded or missing. In the end, 51 were mortally wounded. Like the Second Battle of Bull Run, they had had the highest casualty rate of their Division. After their two years of service, the men of Regiment were mustered out on 28 May 1863 in Utica, Oneida County, New York. This is how Paul Taylor describes the fortunes of the Regiment in an overview of his 2005 book, Glory Was Not Their Companion, which lists Jeremiah Boss in the Regimental Roster, but not an Ingalls:


This is a story of New Yorkers who were recruited primarily from the gentle farmlands of central New York young and middle-aged, American and European, farmer and tradesman, poor and well-off all of whom were among the first to step forward and answer their fledgling nation's call during the Civil War. Though those young men marched proudly off to war anticipating glory and quick victory, victory was usually absent and glory was not their companion. Official accolades never seemed to materialize, and death soon wrapped its cold arms around the Second Oneida with a vengeance experienced by very few other blue-clad regiments. To be fair, more often than not the regiment was placed in difficult, often impossible tactical situations, which resulted in the New Yorkers being forced to leave the field in disorder. They did their best and played their small role in a much bigger production whose results helped to shape America into what it is today.


From the records, it would appear that Jeremiah was 19 years old when he survived Fredericksburg. It is not clear whether the sabre wound was given by a calvary trooper or by an Confederate officer of foot. In either case, the sabre and bayonet wounds meant that he had fought at very close quarters. These wounds may have been gained at an earlier time than Fredericksburg, given Taylor's description of the situation in the December battle where the actions of two privates would led to their receiving the Medal of Honour. It may be that Jeremiah was a very troubled young man when he returned to Utica and, then, tried to begin his life anew in Kirkland. The fact that he still suffered chronic diarrhea in 1885 might indicate continued distress after the war. From the slightly obscured data in the 1910 Federal Census, it looks like Jeremiah arrived in Minnesota shortly after the war.

Perhaps Jeremiah went west to get away from the reminders of the carnage in the east. He would not have been the only person. Again, he might have wanted to avoid being found by his family. It is also possible that he chose the name Ingalls for a very specific reason. Jeremiah Ingalls (1764-1838), a Congregationalist tavern-keeper, was a composer of some merit and reputation who had written a number of important works. The early ones had been published in a song book called, Christian Harmony. His music became part of an important movement (shape-note singing; e.g., Sacred Harp--remember the movie Cold Mountain with Nichole Kidman and Jude Law) that sought to train choral groups and choirs throughout the United States, particularly in rural areas (see this site for more information).

It should be noted that Alice Zoe was a member of Christ Episcopal Church and that her funeral in the Baptist Church was arranged by her parents.

Please spend some time watching the following videos (especially the Native American and African American shape-note singing) and perhaps even learn more about this important living tradition in the United States at site such as this one.








Saturday, November 28, 2009

Another Bulman in Kirkland and the Strange Case of Jeremiah Boss (Alias Jeremiah Ingalls)


This is a very funny game. This picture is a part of it as you will see below. However, it all started when I stumbled across this message while looking for something else and found another female Bulman in Kirkland. Of course, my suspicion is that she is the daughter of Jeremiah and Abigail.

Need information on both parents:
Adam Boss b. ca 1780, Mohawk, NY, unknown where buried, m. Lydia Cary b. ca 1784 Mass, d. May 5, 1860 aged 76 Kirkland NY, Lydia is buried in Deansboro, Oneida Co., NY. Four children--All lived in Oneida Co. NY:
Aron b. 1809, a son Leroy b. ca 1843? no documented marriage
Adam b. 1815 d. 1894 m. Sally Smith, no children
Stephen b. 1818 m. Lucina Bulman, c.13, the 1st Jeremiah b. 1843
Henry Alex b. 12 May 1828 Deansville, NY, d. 25 Feb 1912
In the 1850 Federal Census for Kirkland we have:

Stephen Boss 31
Lucina Boss 28

Jeremiah Boss 7

Levi Boss 4

Lucina Boss 3

Adoni Boss 2

Henry Boss 20


In the 1860 Federal Census for the Clinton Post Office, Kirkland we have:

Stephen Boss 42

Lucina Boss 40

Lorenzo Boss 21

Jeremiah Boss 17

Levi Boss 14

Lucina Boss 13

Milton A. Boss 12

Stephen Boss 8

Theodore P. Boss 6

Eliza J. Boss 4

Harriet V. Boss 3

Susan M. Boss 1


And, for the 1870 Federal Census in Kirkland we have:

Stephen Boss 51

Lucina Boss 49

Theodore Boss 16

Harriet Boss 13

Douglass Boss 8

Josephine Boss 4



Jeremiah was also working for Phineas M. and Fanny Miller as a domestic in 1860 Census data. He would enlist in Company I, New York 26th Regiment (the 2nd Oneida Regiment) on 21 May 1861 at the age of 18 and would be mustered out with the Regiment on 28 May 1863. According to the Utica Morning Health and Daily Gazette casualty lists of 19 December 1862, he was wounded in the thigh with a ball. This was at the Battle of Fredericksburg, Virginia. Given that he mustered out with the rest of the regiment in May 1863, he was not entirely crippled. Many men went on to reenlist in other regiments after the muster out. I am not sure about Jeremiah. But, see the mystery beginning to emerge below.

There are many other connections among the Boss family and the other families of Marshall, Kirkland and Augusta. However, their full exploration will have to wait. There are especially other connections with the Millers. I have always thought that there might be connections between the Bulman families and the Millers and Smiths. We will have to see.

Jeremiah is an interesting story that I have not gotten to the bottom of, yet. He takes an alias, Ingalls; perhaps he has taken this name from his wife Margaret who applies for a widow's pension in Minnesota. Jeremiah himself is granted the invalid pension initially in December of 1864. It will be increased by statute in February of 1906. Margaret continues to receive the pension as a widow on her application in 1916 according to various sources.

The Statute at the head of the post was approved during the 54th Congress on 5 February 1906, Session 1:1458. It reads:

Chap. 144--An Act Granting an Increase of pension to Jeremiah Ingalls alias Jeremiah Boss.

Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of American in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Interior be, and he is hereby, authorised and directed to place on the pension roll, subject to the provisions and limitations of the pension laws, the name of Jeremiah Ingalls alias Jeremiah Boss, late of Company I, Twenty-sixth Regiment New York Volunteer Infantry, and pay him a pension at the rate of twenty-four dollars per month in lieu of that he is now receiving.
Sadly, neither of his parents lived very long after the 1870 Federal Census. The following can be found for the Deansboro Cemetery (many stories to be worked out such as that of Henry and Achsah):

Boss, Achsah b. 1842 d. Oct. 19, 1912 69yrs. Sec. 5 pg. 28
Boss, Adam b. 1815 d. Oct. 9, 1897 Sec. 5 pg. 19
Boss, Benjamin d. Jan. 20, 1887 pg. 14
Boss, Clinton d. April 30, 1941 pg. 42
Boss, Harrie M. d. Nov. 30, 1888 pg. 15
Boss, Henry A. b. 1828 d. Feb. 25, 1913 Sec. 5 pg. 28
Boss, Julia M. b. 1845 d. Dec. 24, 1908(st) 1909(Rec.) Sec. 1 pg.25
Boss, Levi T. d. Oct. 4, 1894 60yrs. Sec. 1 pg. 18 C. K 117th Regt. N.Y.V.
Boss, Lucina d. Sept. 12, 1871 50y 9m pg. 7
Boss, Lydia d. May 5, 1860 76yrs. pg. 4
Boss, Milton A. b. 1848 d. May 2, 1887 39y 2m Sec. 1 pg. 14
Boss, Sally Smith b. 1818 d. March 31, 1895 76y 6m 17d Sec. 1 pg.18
Boss, Susan d. June 1_, 1870 11y 4m pg. 7
Boss, Stephen d. April 5, 1875 57y 7m 15d pg. 9


Confirming on bit of history: Patrick Bulman and the War of 1812

Canadian troops are pictured being encouraged by the mortally wounded Major General Brock to continue the attack at the Battle of Queenston near Niagra Falls at the beginning of the War of 1812. If Patrick Bulman was in the company of the Captain Brown captured here with his regimental commander, Lieutenant Colonel Peter Allen, then Patrick would have been in the war from the beginning at the age of 18 or so.

If you go to this message board, you will find the full text of the following bit of information provided by one of the members of the list:

There was this article in the American Historian, April 1876 with information from Glenvil, Schenectady County.

Christopher Bulman came from Connecticut about 1795, was twice married. His second wife was Betsy Dibble, of Schoharie County. Children: Patrick, soldier of the war of 1812 [NRAA has no record of Patrick], removed to Texas [Texas has no record of him either!]; Henry, born 1800.

Henry, son of Christopher, married Jane, daughter of Jacobus Van eps. Children: Christopher; Caroline, born 1833, married William Van Eps; Mary Melissa born 1836, married James van Eps; Levina, married John Van Eps; James E. born 1840 married Susan Ochenpauch of Cherry Valley; Eliza, married Samuel Hagadorn; Jane married Justus Oothout.


We now have evidence that Patrick Bulman, brother of Jeremiah and Henry, was a soldier in the War of 1812. Again, the information came through the good offices of a Historical Society. This time through the one based in East Troy Wisconsin. Here is the gist of the information provided to us, keeping in mind that we had already found and I had posted much of what is below:

Patrick Bulman m. Sarah Vale and lived in Waukesha County WI. Patrick is buried in St. James Rose Hill Cemetery in Sussex, Waukesha Co., WI. All that is on his marker is his name and the date d. 1869. Sarah Vale is buried in Troy Lakes Cemetery, East Troy, WI. in the Sawyer lot. She died Jan. 12., 1875/1878? Patrick died in a train accident and was named after a Dr. Patrick according to Villa Belle Sawyer's history. Villa Belle's grandparents were Cephas Sawyer who married Maria Vale, daughter of Patrick Bulman and Sarah Vale. She died Nov. 14, 1893. Notes say she came to WI when age 16. Susan Bulman daughter of Patrick and Sarah m. Seymour brooks. She was born June 30, 1826 Oneida, N.Y. and m June 19, 1847 and had 6 children. Patrick Bulman received a land patent for 120 acres warrant number 19584. On that document it says Patrick Bulman, Private Captain Brown's Co., New York Militia, War 1812. The land was issued at LaCrosse, WI. He assigned it to Lucius S. Blake. Mary Bulman, widow of Henry Bulman also received a patent as well as Nathaniel Bulman, Falls St. Croix, WI.
What I had never been able to find was any land documentation for Patrick. Here was some indication that there would be something. So, I checked the Bureau of Land Management's General Land Office site again and found two documents. One is for 1857 (40 acres according to the September 28, 1850 Act) and one is for 1858 (120 acres according to the March 3, 1855 Act). You can click on the links and then click on the tab for documents to view or print the documents. Both mention the War of 1812 connection and the patents were given accordingly.

I suspect that since the land was in Monroe and Buffalo Counties that Patrick got the land and immediately assigned it to others in a land speculation scheme where he was paid a lesser amount immediately. The speculators would have sold the land to those arriving later at a much bigger profit. Of course, they were taking the risk. People may have chosen to settle elsewhere. This will become one of the dramas in a latter generation in Montana.

So, now we know that Patrick actually was in the War of 1812. It is very unlikely that he was in Texas. However, at least one son was there during the Civil War. I have a theory as to why Texas was mentioned rather than Wisconsin. I don't think it was merely because Henry Bulman of Glenville was dead by 1871 (Jane, his wife, apparently died in April 1875).



Six Degrees of Separation from Edmund Burke , More or Less

Not long ago, the youngest of the Three Sisters found a copy of the Selected Prose of Edmund Burke in a used book shop we visit a couple of times of year in county Victoria. She remembered the name from her French Revolution class of her secondary college days. What she noticed, what captured her vision, was the cover to the left. I think that Burke, the author of A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful, would have been pleased at this.

I am interested in what is inside the covers of this book that was edited and introduced by Sir Philip Magnus and published by the Falcon Press in 1948. Given the post-war economy, the quality of the work is amazing in terms of stitching and paper, as well as print quality. But, it is the writing that is truly wonderful. Few Americans today realise what effect Burke had on the writing and early interpretation of the United States Constitution mentioned in the previous post. Few Catholics realise how much they owe to Burke.

I'll shortly reproduce a portion of his Letter on Catholic Emancipation which was dated 29 January 1795 and written to William Smith, Esquire, who was a member of the Irish Parliament. Before doing so, I will say two things. First, Sir Walter Scott and Robbie Burns were Jacobites and not Jacobins. Typical readers of Dan Brown novels are likely to get this confused. Also, they are likely to think that Thomas Paine was brilliant. He was not a patch on Burke. In fact, Burkean sentiment in the United States during this period was much higher than any support for Paine who was actually run out of the country.

It has only been in these latter years that Paine's star has risen in the celestial canopy of some Americans for reasons that both Burke and De Tocqueville both preciently perceived. Burke would probably quip that this has more to do with the earth bound nature of the canopy held aloft by Brownites rather than the loftiness of the Star of Paine which should be forever bound to the early motto of the Jacobins: liberte, equalite, fraternite ou la mort.

Now, the Jacobins were also not of Patrick Henry's mind. His pronouncement of "give me liberty or give me death" had to do with his willingness to die in the fight for freedom. For the Jacobins, it had to do with the death of others whose opinions differ from the party line and the destruction of a society ordered on something more than the most recent mewling of a brains trust controlled by the political tyrants of the moment, as Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth discovered to their horror during the Reign of Terror.

Readers of Dan Brown may well misunderstand Burke's use of the terms "prejudice" and "prescription", as well. The first may well be thought of by them as something one should avoid admitting to having at all costs in order to be politically correct; it's all the fashion you know. And, the second would probably be thought to refer to that which should be obtained at all costs to ensure one is able to live long and be banal; not for them a single "crowded hour" of real life. Here is the quote from Sir Walter Scott's, Count Robert of Paris, page 296 (remember, Scott is a Jacobite, not a Jacobin):

One hour of life, crowded to the full with glorious action, and filled with noble risks, is worth whole years of those mean observances of paltry decorum in which men steal through existence, like sluggish waters through a marsh, without either honour or observation.

To see what I mean, spend some time reading Bourke's prosecution of Warren Hastings to get an idea of the unrelenting nature of his commitment to justice before the law. You will also see the international scope of his concern for responsible action.

My second thought has been this. I am not that far removed from Burke in either temperment or time. With regards to time, it came as a shock to realise our relative closeness. My great-grandfather, Frederick Albert Bulman (FAB) died about the time I was seven. His grandmother, Sarah Vale Bulman (SVB) may have died when was six. She was born in either 1794 or 1795, supposedly in Holland. By then, many of the Dutch were more than willing to take the risks involved with crossing the seas and setting out as pioneers. They preferred this to becoming fuel for the fire-storm of Europe.

She may have been a short distance away from Burke when he wrote his important letters regarding the freedom of Catholics after the French Terror. In fact, if she really were born in Holland in 1794 rather than in America of Dutch parents, then their ship might well have left for the United States from an English port.

In any case, I knew FAB and he knew SVB. She was born in the time of Burke. Yet, we have all known Burke's influence more or less proximately for the last two hundred years. When that light fades from our imaginations, God help us.

A selection from a Letter to William Smith, in Ireland, follows. An online version of the whole can be found here:

My whole politics, at present, centre in one point, and to this the merit or demerit of every measure (with me) is referable,—that is, what will most promote or depress the cause of Jacobinism. What is Jacobinism? It is an attempt (hitherto but too successful) to eradicate prejudice out of the minds of men, for the purpose of putting all power and authority into the hands of the persons capable of occasionally enlightening the minds of the people. For this purpose the Jacobins have resolved to destroy the whole frame and fabric of the old societies of the world, and to regenerate them after their fashion. To obtain an army for this purpose, they everywhere engage the poor by holding out to them as a bribe the spoils of the rich. This I take to be a fair description of the principles and leading maxims of the enlightened of our day who are commonly called Jacobins.

As the grand prejudice, and that which holds all the other prejudices together, the first, last, and middle object of their hostility is religion. With that they are at inexpiable war. They make no distinction of sects. A Christian, as such, is to them an enemy. What, then, is left to a real Christian, (Christian as a believer and as a statesman,) but to make a league between all the grand divisions of that name, to protect and to cherish them all, and by no means to proscribe in any manner, more or less, any member of our common party? The divisions which formerly prevailed in the Church, with all their overdone zeal, only purified and ventilated our common faith, because there was no common enemy arrayed and embattled to take advantage of their dissensions; but now nothing but inevitable ruin will be the consequence of our quarrels. I think we may dispute, rail, persecute, and provoke the Catholics out of their prejudices; but it is not in ours they will take refuge. If anything is, one more than another, out of the power of man, it is to create a prejudice. Somebody has said, that a king may make a nobleman, but he cannot make a gentleman.

All the principal religions in Europe stand upon one common bottom. The support that the whole or the favored parts may have in the secret dispensations of Providence it is impossible to tell; but, humanly speaking, they are all prescriptive religions. They have all stood long enough to make prescription and its chain of legitimate prejudices their main stay. The people who compose the four grand divisions of Christianity have now their religion as an habit, and upon authority, and not on disputation,—as all men who have their religion derived from their parents and the fruits of education must have it, however the one more than the other may be able to reconcile his faith to his own reason or to that of other men. Depend upon it, they must all be supported, or they must all fall in the crash of a common ruin. The Catholics are the far more numerous part of the Christians in your country; and how can Christianity (that is now the point in issue) be supported under the persecution, or even under the discountenance, of the greater number of Christians? It is a great truth, and which in one of the debates I stated as strongly as I could to the House of Commons in the last session, that, if the Catholic religion is destroyed by the infidels, it is a most contemptible and absurd idea, that this, or any Protestant Church, can survive that event. Therefore my humble and decided opinion is, that all the three religions prevalent more or less in various parts of these islands ought all, in subordination to the legal establishments as they stand in the several countries, to be all countenanced, protected, and cherished, and that in Ireland particularly the Roman Catholic religion should be upheld in high respect and veneration, and should be, in its place, provided with all the means of making it a blessing to the people who profess it,—that it ought to be cherished as a good, (though not as the most preferable good, if a choice was now to be made,) and not tolerated as an inevitable evil. If this be my opinion as to the Catholic religion as a sect, you must see that I must be to the last degree averse to put a man, upon that account, upon a bad footing with relation to the privileges which the fundamental laws of this country give him as a subject. I am the more serious on the positive encouragement to be given to this religion, (always, however, as secondary,) because the serious and earnest belief and practice of it by its professors forms, as things stand, the most effectual barrier, if not the sole barrier, against Jacobinism. The Catholics form the great body of the lower ranks of your community, and no small part of those classes of the middling that come nearest to them. You know that the seduction of that part of mankind from the principles of religion, morality, subordination, and social order is the great object of the Jacobins. Let them grow lax, skeptical, careless, and indifferent with regard to religion, and, so sure as we have an existence, it is not a zealous Anglican or Scottish Church principle, but direct Jacobinism, which will enter into that breach. Two hundred years dreadfully spent in experiments to force that people to change the form of their religion have proved fruitless. You have now your choice, for full four fifths of your people, of the Catholic religion or Jacobinism. If things appear to you to stand on this alternative, I think you will not be long in making your option.



Locating the "Bullman House" in Deansville

For some time now, I have been trying to pinpoint exactly where the Bulman's lived in Marshall. This would have been the earlier listing of the Bulmans in the region before Patrick Bulman and his family left for Wisconsin. The census data indicated that they lived near Thomas Dean. Dean had been the headmaster of the Brothertown Indian school, as well as their agent and attorney. He originally received an allotment just south of where Samson Occom had lived on Lot 10 of the Brothertown lands. So, since the Dean's lived and worked initially on Lot 11, I had thought the Bulmans might be near there. In fact, although that is another story, some Bulmans actually owned a portion of Lot 11 for a time.

With the kind help of the folks at the Clinton Historical Society, Oneida County, I was able to received very helpful information. I had originally approached the Marshall Historical Society of the same County. Good neighbours that they are, they directed me towards those with the required resources. It seems the Clinton Courier is on microfilm at the former Society. On Thursday, May 10, 1866, the paper ran a story of the retracing of the Marshall-Kirkland town line. To help follow the article, you can view an 1874 map that is graciously provided at Historic Map Works.

The "Bullman House" was no longer standing in 1866. But, it had been significant for the retracing. The original line had gone right through the centre of the house in 1828! In other words, the house had been built before the new town line had been established and the house became one of the centre points. Now, given the story below, it would seem that the house was on the extreme left (west) end of the line near the Augusta town line; perhaps it had been built in Lot 122.

It is not that far from either Lot 11 or Lot 17 where the Deans built their mansion. Again, I'll get back to the Dean family later. [The picture to the right which is found in The Journal of Thomas Dean: An Account of a Journey to Indiana in 1817; the journal was published by his grandson in 1918 and I am assuming is out of copyright. Deansville was changed to Deansboro in the 1890s because of all the mail going to Dansville, New York...the article marking the occasion has a great deal about the Dean family and will be posted in the future.]

Just a little background before the newspaper article. The town of Kirkland in Oneida County, New York was first settled about the time of the signing of the United States Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787. It was established as a town in 1827 having been separated from the Town of Paris. Kirkland was named after Samuel Kirkland who had been a missionary to the Oneida Indians. Kirkland had been instrument in persuading the Oneidas to join with the Colonials over agains the Loyalists during the War of Independence. There are a number of ramifications of this that I won't go into now.

A Surveyor General's map of 1829 shows that Kirkland lies north of the Brothertown Indian patent and west of the Coxes Patent. On the west is part of the Oneida Reservation and further west is the land that the Oneida's had set aside for the Strockbridge Indians of Massachusetts. Unfortunately, the various maps of 1829 seem to create more confusion than help in the matter, as they all indicate something different. According to the records, that same year a part of Kirkland was used to form the town of Marshall. If the line was established in 1828, this mayhave been done in preparation for the act which created the new town.

So, in the 1820 Federal Census, the Bulman families were in the Town of Paris with Paris Hill to the east. In 1830, they were in the Town of Marshall. By 1840, the Jeremiah Bullmans had moved north into Kirkland proper and the Patrick Bulmans were still at the "Bullman House". By 1850, Jeremiah's two sons, William and Jeremiah, were living together in Kirkland. And, by 1860, they were living separately in Kirkland. There is no trace of William or Jeremiah in the 1870 census. However, there are certainly sisters in the area. That, and more, is another; it will require several more posts. Like all good stories, it will be one of tragedy, triumph and mystery.

Of the underlying sentiment found in the following article, I am reminded of one of Robert Frost's Vermont "characters" quipping in a poem, "Good fences make good neighbours." Just think of the serendipity of it all; we know something more about ourselves through the reporting of this mundane activity. I wonder if Jeremiah Bulman, Jr., who was still living in Kirkland at this point, read this story. What were the memories that were recalled to his mind?

CORRESPONDENCE

Kirkland and Marshall Town Line.

It may not be known to some of our
younger citizens that Paris, Kirkland

and Marshall, were all embraced in
one town until about 40 years ago.
Kirkland was first set off. This made
a second division equally necessary,
and the new town was called Marshall.
There was much opposition as to the
cutting up of the "old town of Paris"
as it was sometimes called by way of
pre-eminence; but it was done, and
doubtless for the best. The south line
of Kirkland was to commence at the
southeast corner of lot No. 86, Coxe's
patent, and run due west, as the nee-
dle pointed in 1772, to the east line of
Augusta; distance about six miles.
About half this line was located by a
party from each town March 19th, 1828,
and, for a wonder the other half waited
five years and a half. The course run
was north 88 deg., 30 min. west. Deans-
ville was then scarcely a village. The
Chenango canal was being constructed,
which gave it a rapid growth, and
houses were erected either on or so
near the town line that it became a
question on which side the residences
belonged. It was recently decided,
by the proper authorities, to retrace
this line with a view to a final settle-
ment. Last week another party met
for this purpose, there being only one
person who was present on the first
running. The property line had faith-
fully kept the trust committed to it
nearly forty years ago; and that noble
tree centred, stood a true sentinel,
presenting its scars as evidence of its
trust-worthiness, and being an excel-
lent target for back sights a great dis-
tance. Arriving at Post St., we passed
as before between the house and well
or spring, but the house was not there
it having been destroyed by fire some
years since. It was the residence of
Mr. Byer. Mrs. B. remarked in passing
"they would have to go out of town for
all their water," but gave the party a
lunch for all that.

The next crossing, or next but one,
was a short distance above Mr. Alonzo
Barker's, at whose residence the party
were hospitably entertained.

On reaching the Oriskany we had
the choice of fording the stream, or go-
ing a mile for a bridge. The former
was taken and as we could not expect
the water to divide for our benefit, we
put out and reached the other bank
with only the loss of our target. In-
stead of the long dreary swamp of the
first running, it had mostly disappear-
ed and was under cultivation. Coming
in sight of the "Bullman house" or
more correctly the site whereon it stood,
as the house had long since vanished,
the accuracy of this review was to be
tested as the house was centered in
1828. Suffice it to say that the result
is highly satisfactory, and it is hoped
and believed that another generation
may pass away before this line will
need retracing. In reply to Dr. Avery's
request that the variation of the com-
pass since the survey of 1828 should
be ascertained, I answer that of little if
any could be found. B.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Feast of All Souls, Commemoration of all the Faithful Departed

All then blessed the ways of the Lord, the just judge who brings hidden things to light, and they all turned to prayer, beseeching that the sin which had been committed might be wholly blotted out. And the noble Judas exhorted the people to keep themselves free from sin, for they had seen with their own eyes what had happened because of the sin of those who had fallen. He also took up a collection, man by man, to the amount of two thousand drachmas of silver, and sent it to Jerusalem to provide for a sin offering. In doing this he acted very well and honorably, taking account of the resurrection. For if he were not expecting that those who had fallen would rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead. But if he was looking to the splendid reward that is laid up for those who fall asleep in godliness, it was a holy and pious thought. Therefore he made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin.
2 Maccabees 12:41-45 (Michelangelo)

May the Lord grant mercy to the house of Onesiphorus, for he often refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain, but when he was in Rome, he sought me diligently, and found me (the Lord grant to him to find the Lord’s mercy on that day); and in how many things he served at Ephesus, you know very well.
2 Timothy 1:16-18 (William Bouguereau)

Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.

And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.

Matthew 12:31-32.


Every man's work shall be manifest. For the day of the Lord shall declaire it, because it shall be revealed in fire. And the fire shall try every man's work, of what sort it is. AIf any man's work abid, whcih he hath build thereupon, he shall receive a reward. I fany man's work burn, he shall suffer loss; but he himself shall be saved, yet so as by fire.
1 Corinthians 3:13-15

For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit;

By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;

Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
1 peter 3:18-20


Learn more here.